Wednesday, 31 August 2011
The End Of Summer
British Summer (if not British Summer Time) ends tomorrow, as Autumn begins. According to the latest BBC news on radio 4, the week ahead will actually warm up to mid-20s Celsius - so, an Indian Summer, then. The last fortnight has been generally miserable, weatherwise - a wash-out of rainy days and unsunny skies. Meanwhile, the world has been gloomy economically, and otherwise. One small silver lining - there appears to have been no major air disaster in August - which, given the fact this is the busiest month for flying - is an achievement. Eyewear looks forward to the start of the new term. Sharp new pencils. Clean new Silvine Excercise books. Poetry readings. Launches. Crisper air. Pumpkins. Poppies on lapels. Christmas parties. And then a new year. It all starts tomorrow. Today, grab that BBQ and ball cap and have yourself a last fling of summer.
JCS On The New Will Young Album
Written by James Christopher Sheppard
The original Pop Idol returns, Will Young releases his fifth studio album, Echoes, at the end of August. Young
hasn’t made big waves since his second album Friday’s Child when it reached five times platinum status and
provided him with the massive single ‘Leave Right Now’ and ‘Your Game’.
However, all of his album releases have gone Top Ten in the UK and been
certified platinum. The openly gay popstar clearly has a devoted and loyal fan
base, but can Echoes propel him back
to the success of his early days? The entire album is produced by electronic
and synthpop producer Richard X, so
the collection should be more attention-grabbing than Young’s last rather
unmemorable effort, Let It Go.
‘Jealousy’
First single, ‘Jealousy’, has already
created some excitement amongst the Young fan-base, perhaps due to the upbeat
feel of the song. It’s a simple, breezy, emotional tinged synth pop with an 80s
feel. The song does have a certain charm, but is unlikely to have the masses
yearning to hear it over and over again.
5/10
‘Come On’
The tempo and mood is accelerated on ‘Game
On’, combining the synth sound with an almost Florence and the Machine ‘Rabbit Heart (Raise it Up)’ drum beat with
an element of ‘Maps’ by the Yeah Yeah
Yeah’s. While the song certainly shares some similarities with the
aforementioned songs, ‘Game On’ feels modern, radio friendly and certainly more
addictive than ‘Jealousy’.
8/10
‘Runaway’
Sister track to ‘Jealousy’, ‘Runaway’ is
breezy with mellow 80s synths circulating around Young sticking to his higher
register. This is pretty catchy, with a hypnotic melody.
6/10
‘Lie Next to Me’
It’s ballad time and ‘Lie Next to Me’ will
make Will Young fans happy enough. It’s quite dream-like, with Young relying on
his voice to carry the song. The production is almost like a boy band Christmas
single from the late 90s or early 00s. The emotion comes across in Young’s
vocal, but the lyrics are almost too simple to really evoke an emotional
reaction. Some people will absolutely love it, some may not. I’m somewhere in
the middle.
5/10
‘Safe From Harm’
Almost Scissor
Sister sounding, ‘Safe From Harm’ has a slightly darker element to it than
the first four tracks. The synths are complimented by a simple piano played
melody and Young uses his voice more variably, which is a breath of fresh air
at this point.
7/10
‘Good Things’
Will seems to have jumped eras and gone
from the 80s into the mid 90s. ‘Good Things’ sounds inspired by George Michael’s classic hit
‘Fastlove’, which knowing his audience is possibly a stroke of genius. A pretty
decent example of adult pop, I can already imagine my Mum listening to this on
repeat.
8/10
‘Happy Now’
The first song to not rely on synth-pop is
‘Happy Now’. Usually I listen to a song while I write about it… I have to say I
listened to the whole of this track and had only written one sentence. What can
I say about ‘Happy Now’? It’s a pretty slow to mid-tempo song about Will
singing about being happy now. The instrumentation is quite refreshing at this
point and Will sounds more comfortable here than on some other points on the
album, but it is a little dull.
4/10
‘Hearts on Fire’
Another tempo change, ‘Hearts on Fire’ is
an understated dance number that I can imagine being played in Soho’s coolest
bars. The melody is darker than most of the album and the whole song has a
certain dangerous and intriguing sexuality about it.
8/10
‘Personal Thunder’
Another dark, brooding number, ‘Personal
Thunder’ cements Young’s position as the current answer to being what George
Michael was during his Older period.
The emotion behind ‘Thunder’ is enchanting.
8/10
‘Losing Myself’
This is possibly the most 80s sounding
track on the album to this point. It could almost be a hit factory produced
mid-tempo ballad. It’s not bad.
6/10
‘Silent Valentine’
Featuring the most unique and original
production on the collection, ‘Silent Valentine’ is transformed from just
another synth-heavy electronic slow number, to a gradual captivating track that
is one of the most memorable featured here.
8/10
‘I Just Want a Lover’
Appealing to a more mature ear, and perhaps
a crowd at a swanky cocktail bar rather than your local Oceana club, ‘I Just
Want a Lover’ picks up where ‘Good Things’ left off. ‘I just want a lover,
nothing that is complicated. I don’t have to know you, we don’t have to talk
about it’ Young sings as the song closes. Could this be Will’s sexiest moment
yet?
8/10
‘Outsider’
The haunting nature of ‘Outsider’ mimics
that of Adele’s ‘Hometown Glory’.
It’s a brilliant way to round off the album, which at times is a little lacking
in emotion. ‘Outsider’ is soft and hears Young as his most vulnerable here.
8/10
The
prospect of sitting down and listening to Echoes
from start to finish was not something I looked forward to doing. Until I saw
that Richard X had been involved, I expected to hear something dreary and dull,
but then I pressed play. While it may not be to everyone’s taste, Echoes will certainly charm those that
already like Will Young and will definitely appeal to the adult-pop fans that
loved George Michael during Older, as
well as Darren Hayes solo efforts. Echoes is not the most original album,
but it is well crafted and coherent. Whether Echoes will impact to wider audiences and be massive, is something
else entirely, but it’s pretty good.
Overall
score: 7/10
JCS is Eyewear's music critic and divides his time between London and Hull. He is currently working on a novel.
Monday, 29 August 2011
Guest Review: Brinton On Ragg's Stevens
Ian Brinton reviews
by Edward Ragg
In this highly persuasive and readable account of the
later poetry of Wallace Stevens Edward Ragg examines the world of abstraction
and the practice of ‘the aesthetics of abstraction’ in the poet’s work. The
introduction, itself a model of clarity, looks at ‘how abstract reflections
conjure commonality, ordinariness and “the normal” without promulgating hollow
generalizations.’ One point of reference here is the attitude adopted by
Charles Tomlinson to Stevens’ early work. Looking at a 1964 interview with Ian
Hamilton it is easy to see why the young English poet and artist should feel
some disquiet about the American whose work he had first come across via his mentor
Donald Davie whilst studying at Cambridge:
It was a case of being
haunted by Stevens rather than of cold imitation. I was also a painter and this
meant that I had far more interest in the particulars of a landscape or an
object than Stevens. Stevens rarely makes one see anything in detail for all
his talk about a physical universe.
When he published his autobiographical sketches, Some Americans, in 1981 Tomlinson’s view
had become more generous. Not only did he recall how the early ‘Thirteen Ways of
Looking at a Blackbird’ led him for a while to look from different angles at
separate instances of the meticulous but also how he had written an essay in
1951 on ‘The Comedian as Letter C’. Tomlinson sent the essay to Stevens and
received a courteous reply pointing out that the poem exploited sounds of the
letter c:
These sounds include all the
hard and soft variations and pass over into other sounds, or rather, the sound
of other letters…This grows tiresome if one is too conscious of it, but it is
easy to ameliorate the thing.
An odd way to write poems, reflected Tomlinson, ‘but a
regard for such minute particulars of language’ impressed him.
Ragg engages time and again with close textual
criticism taking the reader back to the words of the poems themselves and one
of his twenty-page tours de force is a close examination of the 1945 poem ‘The
Pure Good of Theory’ where he dwells upon Stevens’ obsession with time and
relates it to the allusions to Macbeth which haunt the piece. The poem, in four
sections, opens with ‘All the Preludes to Felicity’:
It is
time that beats in the breast and it is time
That batters against the
mind, silent and proud,
The mind that knows it is
destroyed by time.
Time is a horse that runs in
the heart, a horse
Without a rider on a road at
night.
The mind sits listening and
hears it pass.
It is someone walking
rapidly in the street.
The reader by the window has
finished his book
And tells the hour by the
lateness of the sounds.
As Ragg points out, because the mind, the intellect,
knows that it is destroyed by time the metaphorical use of horse ‘creates the
self-protective illusion that the mind can conquer, or at least be reconciled
to time.’ Metaphorical expression can have an ameliorating effect and the ‘mind
conceives time’s progress through metaphor because felicitous expressions are
palliative.’ However, pursuing his argument concerning the growth of
abstraction in Stevens’ poetry, Ragg suggests that this palliative metaphorical
world is abandoned ‘for abstract conception’:
Even
breathing is the beating of time, in kind:
A retardation of its
battering,
A horse grotesquely taut, a
walker like
A shadow in mid-earth…If we
propose
A large-sculptured, platonic
person, free from time,
And imagine for him the
speech he cannot speak,
A form, then, protected from
the battering, may
Mature: A capable being may
replace
Dark horse and walker
walking rapidly.
Here the metaphors are themselves ‘suspended in an
ellipsis which implies metaphor’s limitations’:
That is, the horse remains
‘taut’ and the walker as insubstantial as a ‘shadow’ because the mind realizes
metaphors cannot themselves ward off the ‘battering’ of time.
Ragg points to the abstract nature of a ‘platonic
person’ who is impossibly ‘free from time’, the preserve of the imaginative
mind:
Note how agency is given to
the ‘we’ who propose the figure, who must ‘imagine for him the speech he cannot
speak’. Rather than promulgate traditional metaphors for time, ‘The Pure Good
of Theory’ re-invests the mind with abstract creative power.
The poem’s third section, ‘Fire-Monsters in the Milky
Brain’, opens with a direct reference to Macbeth,
‘Man, that is not born of woman but of air’, alluding to one of the prophecies
made via the agency of the witches. Macbeth of course fails to understand the
double-truth and does not link the spirit’s words with the untimely ripping of
Macduff from his mother’s womb. A literal reading of a man born ‘of air’ leads
us to fantasy whereas reading the ‘man’ figuratively we are left to conclude
that ‘the abstraction requires further metaphor to come alive’. Referring to
the incorporeal nature of the witches Macbeth himself had suggested that they had
disappeared ‘Into the air, and what seemed corporal/Melted as breath into the
wind.’ What Macbeth fails of course to recognise is that the metaphor he uses
suggests that their presence is within himself and is only given shape by his
exhalations on a cold day.
The reality of Stevens is ‘like a sound in his mind’
as it occurs in one of the last of his published poems, ‘Not Ideas About the
Thing But the Thing Itself’:
At the
earliest ending of winter,
In March, a scrawny cry from
outside
Seemed like a sound in his
mind.
He knew he heard it……
That scrawny cry—it was
A chorister whose c preceded
the choir.
It was part of the colossal
sun,
Surrounded by its choral
rings,
Still far away. It was like
A new knowledge of reality.
Ragg’s totally engaging analysis of ‘The Pure Good of
Theory’ endorses his claims concerning abstraction as it testifies to the pragmatic
benefits of an abstract aesthetic which Stevens only fully realized in his
final decade. J. Hillis Miller’s comment on the back cover of this book says it
all: Anyone
interested in Stevens’ poetry should have this superb book.
Ian Brinton is an English critic and scholar who reviews regularly for Eyewear.
Sunday, 28 August 2011
Guest Review: Begnal On Clifford
Michael S. Begnal reviews
by Graham
Clifford
Graham Clifford’s pamphlet Welcome Back to the Country, published
by Seren Books, is the winner of the Poetry Wales Purple Moose Prize for
2010. It’s nice to see that a beer
brewery (Purple Moose) somewhere in the world sponsors poetry publications –
others ought to do so too; it would be a great help to poets everywhere. Clifford, the winner of this contest, has also
been successful in a number of other contests, and his poetry seems well-suited
for the contest milieu. It is
accessible, straightforward, with craftsmanship apparent so that it is capable
of appealing to both the general reader and the poet-judge. This could either be a good thing or a dissatisfying
thing, depending on the individual who chooses to engage with his work (if, for
example, he or she falls into something other than the “general reader”
category).
Zoƫ
Skoulding, one of the two judges, provides a blurb arguing
that “these poems locate the dark edges of ‘ordinary life’ so precisely as to
reveal that no such thing exists.” In
other words, we are meant to see via these poems that even the seemingly
mundane is in reality worth our closer attention and could be full of
unexpected surprises, depending on how attentive the poet is to the
details. This may be true, but I’m not
so certain that this is what Clifford’s project always consists of here. In fact, he seems to be fairly dismissive of ordinary
country life. He does render it
precisely, as Skoulding suggests, but there is little that is affirmative about
most of these poems, or even darkly so.
If anything, Clifford often seems to be venting his annoyance and
disgust and a desire to be elsewhere. In
“Holiday ,” for example, he writes,
I know it is
wrong to ask, but
could we,
perhaps,
be more like
somebody else
one day?
I’m bored of myself,
these arms and
legs and this past,
I’ve heard it
all before:
the small town
the moths the sewing machine
haunting the
spare room…
Such ordinary existence (running together
without commas) seems to be the last thing he wants any part of. Similarly, his poem “The year of rain” paints
an even bleaker portrait of village life, with suitably-observed particulars
(“Outside we will shelter in bus stops/ and pavilions, the 1940s ice cream
parlour/ with psoriasis of the paint job…”).
And then we come to “On a slope”:
Trapped for ever
in this town
a green, open prison with too much sky,
too much surface area cooling quickly down
where spinsters and wealthy men who wear
ironed jeans scowl along supermarket aisles.
You serve them, burning up, desperate for
your share. Perhaps you have been forgotten
or the very best you deserve is a carnival
by the canal locks, featuring the local librarian…
a green, open prison with too much sky,
too much surface area cooling quickly down
where spinsters and wealthy men who wear
ironed jeans scowl along supermarket aisles.
You serve them, burning up, desperate for
your share. Perhaps you have been forgotten
or the very best you deserve is a carnival
by the canal locks, featuring the local librarian…
At this point, the reader might be tempted
to say, “I want out of here too.”
An obvious precedent to Clifford is Philip Larkin, the master of bleak
irony coupled with English frustration. The
danger with the precise rendering of the bleak and the mundane in this case,
though, is that, rather than attaining the edginess that Skoulding’s phrase
“locate the dark edges” implies, rather than transmuting the ordinary into the
extraordinary, the poems themselves become mundane, and the reader is imbued
with the same bleak feelings that gave rise to the work to begin with, rather
than with any sense of wonderment. For
me, the ordinary in Welcome Back to the
Country often remains just that. I
acknowledge that it very well could be different for other readers. Zoƫ Skoulding is no slouch.
A desired sense of wonderment can only
occur through the poet’s use of language on the page, I would say, and often
there is enough going on in these pages that Clifford grabs one’s attention. He has a good eye. Other times, though, I was underwhelmed by
form as well as content (this being, again, merely a subjective response). Thus, the poems I liked the best in this
volume were the few that veered away from realistic description, away from the
portraits of the everyday. “No alternative
now” is another escape fantasy, but this time into a surreal forest existence
where “our clothes [drop] from us in leaf shapes/ in the dark crunchiness/
where we copulate quickly like foxes/ and crap standing, ready to run.” Not only are such images welcomely startling,
but Clifford’s language seems concomitantly stronger, both terse and
alliterative. “Being dead” is perhaps
the most humorous piece in the collection, positing an improvement in one’s
life through dying: “You die, and being dead/ are better. From night buses/ you
watch with dry always-open eyes…” What
might also change if Clifford were to similarly let die, through natural
evolution, some of the strategies that have seemingly won him this pamphlet
contest?
Michael S.
Begnal’s new collection Future Blues is
forthcoming this year from Salmon Poetry.
His previous collections include Ancestor Worship (Salmon, 2007)
and Mercury, the Dime (Six Gallery Press, 2005). He has appeared in
numerous journals and anthologies, including Poetry Ireland Review, Notre
Dame Review, and Avant-Post: The Avant-Garde under “Post-” Conditions
(Litteraria Pragensia, 2006). Most recently, he composed the Afterword to James
Liddy’s posthumous collection Fest City
(Arlen House, 2010).
Saturday, 27 August 2011
Byron's BMI
According to today's Guardian, Lord Byron was actually "overweight and unattractive". This seems like nonsense. The evidence is his weight. He is described as five eight (a handsome size at that time), and weighing in at 76 kg, described as "borderline obese". Not so. According to the NHS site which calculates such things, Byron's BMI would have been 25.48, or, very borderline overweight - not the same as obese, and close to a healthy weight. Byron may have had a slight paunch, but he was no Arbuckle. If he was in fact 13 stone (another figure mentioned) he would have been 29 on the BMI scale; 30 is obese - but this might have been with his heavy medical boots on. At 23, he weighed around 63 kg, which would have made him a very slim weight. This seems like a story without much weight to it.
Friday, 26 August 2011
Portrait of Todd Swift by Derek Adams
Derek Adams is a poet and photographer based in London. Here is his recent portrait of me.
![]() |
| Todd Swift, London, August 2011; photo by Derek Adams |
Thursday, 25 August 2011
azul
I am very honoured to appear in the debut edition
of the new
international literary E-zine: azul. azul will be
published twice a year and is available for free from the dynamic international Azul Press, in Holland.
Noon's Version
Eyewear is pleased to publish a new translation of a great poem by Mandelstam, by Alistair Noon in Berlin. This is probably one of the first poems on the cinema. Vachel Lindsay, of course, had written on the subject.
Cinema
Three benches. A projector.
The fever of sentimentality.
An heiress who's been trapped
in her evil rival's nets.
Hands off this love's true flight,
our heroine's done nothing wrong!
So pure it's almost platonic
is her love for a lieutenant of the fleet,
collaterally conceived by a grey count
and now wandering the desert wastes.
This, for the pretty countess, is the way
her picture-adventure leaves the ground.
She starts to wring her hands
like a gypsy gone insane.
The lovers split. The demonic sounds
now follow of a hounded piano.
Her trust's not hard to abuse.
She possesses sufficient bravery
to swoop on some crucial papers
of interest to an enemy HQ.
Along an avenue of chestnuts,
a black motor car lumbers.
The film reel rattles. A thump
of alarm thrills our hearts.
Sensibly dressed, with her sac Ć voyage,
she travels the roads and rails.
All she's scared of is the chase;
she's tormented by a dry mirage.
The ending's both bitter and trite.
Means aren't justified by ends!
He gets his father's inheritance,
and she gets sentenced to life.
Osip Mandelstam, 1913
Translated from the Russian by Alistair Noon
Cinema
Three benches. A projector.
The fever of sentimentality.
An heiress who's been trapped
in her evil rival's nets.
Hands off this love's true flight,
our heroine's done nothing wrong!
So pure it's almost platonic
is her love for a lieutenant of the fleet,
collaterally conceived by a grey count
and now wandering the desert wastes.
This, for the pretty countess, is the way
her picture-adventure leaves the ground.
She starts to wring her hands
like a gypsy gone insane.
The lovers split. The demonic sounds
now follow of a hounded piano.
Her trust's not hard to abuse.
She possesses sufficient bravery
to swoop on some crucial papers
of interest to an enemy HQ.
Along an avenue of chestnuts,
a black motor car lumbers.
The film reel rattles. A thump
of alarm thrills our hearts.
Sensibly dressed, with her sac Ć voyage,
she travels the roads and rails.
All she's scared of is the chase;
she's tormented by a dry mirage.
The ending's both bitter and trite.
Means aren't justified by ends!
He gets his father's inheritance,
and she gets sentenced to life.
Osip Mandelstam, 1913
Translated from the Russian by Alistair Noon
Wednesday, 24 August 2011
JCS Reviews Charlie Simpson
Charlie
Simpson’s Young Pilgrim
Reviewed by James Christopher Sheppard
Charlie Simpson is a name many will know.
Some from his days as a third of teen bopping band Busted and some will know him as front man of alternative rock band
Fightstar. Either way, Simpson has
been known since 2002 and has been a part of five studio albums. At the age of
26, Charlie is releasing his first full-length solo release and it sounds
pretty distanced from anything the singer/songwriter has been involved in before.
‘Down Down Down’
First single from the album is a good
indication of what is to come. The song is entirely acoustic driven, with thick
as treacle vocals, laden with emotional depth. The folk-rock ballad is stacked
with multi-layered harmonies and builds to a gentle climax.
10/10
‘Parachutes’
‘Parachutes’, also the second single, picks
up the pace and builds on what ‘Down, Down’ has already established. This is
possibly the most radio-friendly and mature that Simpson has ever sounded.
Brilliant.
10/10
‘All at Once’
‘All at Once’ at first entices with it’s toe
tapping beats, but the sound soon turns to a sorrow filled as the song of
heartbreak progresses. Simpson’s vocals sound confident and crystal clear, with
the song completely utilising his unique tones. 9/10
‘Thorns’
Gentle, with a subtlety that draws you
right in to the melodic dreamy higher tones of vocal harmony going on in the
background, ‘Thorns’ is a careful ballad. The softer verses against the more
exuberant choruses work wonders here. 9/10
‘Cemetery’
The fifth track shifts the memento into a
new direction. ‘Cemetery’ is a combination of pop-rock-folk, which makes for a
charming reminiscent song and one of absolute authenticity. Simpson’s voice is
pushed to the limit, experimenting with his higher range and occasionally
showing moments of strain, which surprisingly, adds to the song.
9/10
‘Hold On’
The most mellow moment of the album so far,
‘Hold On’, is lead by multiple layers of Simpson’s harmonies against a backdrop
of strings, arranged by the renowned string arranger, Audrey Riley. A well crafted smooth ballad.
9/10
‘I Need a Friend Tonight’
The second string lead track, with
assistance from Riley, is simple and
melodic. ‘Friend’ is mid-tempo, soft and changes the mood of the album
somewhat, as Simpson and the song both remain quite delicate and fragile. It’s
hard to decipher whether ‘Friend’ is Simpson claiming he has found or is
looking for religion, or if he is claiming he is lost and still can’t find his
way home. I’ll let you decide, but it’s a pleasant song all the same.
7/10
‘Suburbs’
The tempo picks up a little with ‘Suburbs’,
but the song in all it’s simplicity does little to further what is already
great about Young Pilgrim. ‘I need
you now, I need you now’ Simpson repeats. It’s possibly the least remarkable
song on the album, but it still is not bad.
6/10
‘Sundown’
The temp change was only temporary as we
are back down to the balladry of ‘Hold On’. ‘My heart is yearning for you
dear’- this strikingly scarce track is one of the most powerful on Young Pilgrim in terms of pure passion.
9/10
‘Farmer & His Gun’
The most folk-tinged moment on the album is
‘Farmer & His Gun’, the mid-tempo country-fied song also featured on the EP
When We Were Lions. ‘Gun’ comes complete
with harmonica melodies and everything, but does sound like it belongs on a
different collection.
7/10
‘If I Lose It’
The melancholic ‘If I Lose It’ has a
passion driving it similar to that displayed on ‘Sundown’, but the
instrumentation is far fuller and production builds into an epic ballad. This
could easily be used as a movie theme, with despair searing through Simpson’s
vocals. This song has real potential commercially.
10/10
‘Riverbanks’
The final track is an absolute triumph- a
soaring piano filled, string and guitar lead epic rock ballad that builds to
the most satisfying climax on Young
Pilgrim. I use the term rock ballad, and some of you may think ‘Uh-Oh,
cheese’, but this is no ‘I Don’t Want a Miss a Thing’, this is authenticity in
itself, with emotion practically dripping from it. ‘Something beautiful is
happening’ Simpson claims, and he’s right, before the track finishes with a
minute-long cinematic instrumental goose-bump inducing end.
10/10
Young
Pilgrim has its flaws. The first six tracks are
absolutely brilliant, so it’s a little disappointing when there’s a couple of
moments in the latter half that let it down a little. Saying that, ‘If I Lose
It’ and ‘Riverbanks’ are two of the most outstanding new songs I have heard
this year. Despite the couple of songs that could have been left off this
album, Young Pilgrim is brimming with
passion and actually could be the best thing Charlie Simpson has ever put his
name to. Fans of Busted are irrelevant really aren’t they? But fans of Fightstar are likely to enjoy Simpson’s
solo effort, despite the change in direction, while fans
of Jason Nozuka, the latest Incubus
album, If Not Now, When? and lovers of brilliant acoustic and
passionate music should definitely check this album out. There could be a lot
more to Charlie Simpson yet.
Young
Pilgrim is available in the UK now through PIAS and
receives an overall rating of 8.5/10
James Christopher Sheppard recently graduated from the acclaimed
Creative Writing degree course at Kingston University and is Eyewear’s music critic, as well as a
freelance writer and published poet. For more information, his website, Intellectual Intercourse, can be found
at Jameschristophersheppard.wordpress.com
Tuesday, 23 August 2011
Crying All The Time
Sad news. Jerry Leiber, who, with Mike Stoller his partner, has claim to be the greatest popular song-writer of the classic Rock and Roll era of Elvis, has died.
Monday, 22 August 2011
Jack Layton Has Died
Sad news. The Leader of the Opposition in Canada, Jack Layton, has died, in his early 60s. Layton was a popular, remarkable political figure, who managed to do the near-impossible, bring the NDP close to victory. He will be much missed.
August August
![]() |
| iconic image of London Riots 2011 |
Thursday, 4 August 2011
Gone Fishin'
Wednesday, 3 August 2011
JCS On The Spice Girls 15 Years On
15
Years of the SPICE GIRLS
by James
Christopher Sheppard
It’s exactly 15 years
since the Spice Girls burst onto the British music scene with ‘Wannabe’ and
stormed to number one. In July 1996 an unknown all-girl pop group were suddenly
all over television and radio promoting a song more pop than pop itself, about
really really wanting a zig-a-zig-ah and friendship never ending. The sentiment
was fresh and girl power was born. The group were hard to miss, with each girl
having their own individual style, which at the time was practically unheard of
in the pop world. Prior to Ginger, Baby, Sporty, Scary and Posh, the commercial
music industry, particularly in the UK, was dominated by indie pop bands like Oasis, Blur and Radiohead, the
super divas Celine Dion and Mariah Carey, and boybands that dressed
the same like Take That and Boyzone. Despite their beginnings as a manufactured
group, Geri, Melanie C, Emma, Melanie B and Victoria broke away, wrote their
own songs, got themselves signed and did it their way. The Spice Girls
represented freedom, fun, girl power and individuality and the world loved it.
In celebration of this 15 year anniversary, I’m going to look at some of the
highlights that have come from this phenomenally successful group of girls over
the years.
Spice was the must-have album of 1996 if you were at school. With only
ten tracks, half of the songs were #1 singles. While people remember ‘Wannabe’,
‘Say You’ll Be There’, ‘2 Become 1’, ‘Who Do You Think You Are?’ and ‘Mama’,
the album also boasts some pretty extraordinary album tracks, like ‘If U Can’t
Dance’ and ‘Naked’. Spice was
released on 4th November 1996 and went on to sell over 23 million
copies worldwide. In just a few months since the girls released ‘Wannabe’,
Spicemania was hitting fever pitch. There were Spice Girls chupa chucks, Spice
Girls duvet sets, Spice Girls wall-paper, Spice Girls Pepsi cans, Spice Girls
chocolate bars, Spice Girls dolls- Spice Girls everything!
Just twelve months after Spice, came its second coming, SpiceWorld. If ever there was a part one
and part two of an album, it was Spice and
SpiceWorld. ‘Spice Up Your Life’,
‘Too Much’ and ‘Viva Forever’ all hit #1 in the UK, whilst ‘Stop’ stalled at
#2. SpiceWorld was not only the
band’s second album, but also the soundtrack to their movie of the same name.
While the movie may have been panned by critics, it still managed to top the UK
box office over Christmas 1997 and hit #2 in the USA, stopping behind
‘Titanic’. SpiceWorld seemed to
pretty much mirror the success of Spice,
selling over 20 million copies and sitting comfortably inside the Best Selling
Albums of All-Time list.
In May 1998, during the ‘Spice World Tour’,
Geri Halliwell split from the group,
which certainly affected the future of the group. As chief songwriter and the
master mind behind Girl Power, what seemed to be the passionate creator of the
group, had jumped ship. Melanie B was
the first of all of the girls to release a solo single, which was the urban ‘I
Want You Back’ with Missy Elliot, which struck #1 on the same day as one of the
group’s Wembley Stadium shows. Later that year, after almost a year of touring,
the four remaining girls recorded and released ‘Goodbye’, scoring their eighth
#1 and third consecutive Christmas #1.
1999 was a quiet year for the group, but
was the first time we saw Geri Halliwell, Emma
Bunton and Melanie C step out as
soloists. Geri Halliwell released her first solo album, Schizophonic, which closely followed the Spice Girl album
ingredients- ten brilliantly catchy pop songs. ‘Look at Me’ hit #2, while ‘Mi
Chico Latino’, ‘Lift Me Up’ and ‘Bag It Up’ all made it to #1. Emma’s first
release outside of the Spice Girls was a cover of ‘What I am’, recorded with Tin Tin Out, which hit #2, behind
Halliwell’s ‘Lift Me Up’. Melanie C initially experienced the least successful
start to her solo career. While her duet with Bryan Adams, ‘When You’re Gone’ had been a huge hit the previous
year, Melanie’s first few solo singles, ‘Goin’ Down’ and ‘Northern Star’ were
only moderately successful and her album Northern
Star charted at #10 and swiftly fell out of the chart. Despite the
luke-warm reception to Melanie C’s solo work, when ‘Never Be The Same Again’
was released in early 2000, the song soared to #1 and remained there for two
weeks. Northern Star subsequently
re-charted and climbed to #4, eventually shifting over 4 million copies
worldwide. Northern Star remains the
most successful release from any solo Spice Girl.
Three years after Spiceworld, came Forever.
The album was heavily R&B influenced, apposed to the previous pure pop
sound the group had stuck to. The double A-side ‘Holler’ and ‘Let Love Lead The
Way’ hit #1 and the album made #2 but quickly disappeared from the chart and
memory. The album was largely seen a failure, both commercially and critically
and spelled out the end of the Spice Girls.
Also at the end of 2000, came Melanie B’s
debut solo effort, the underperforming Hot.
While the album produced a couple of top ten hits, ‘Tell Me’ and ‘Feels So
Good’, Melanie B’s solo career never really gained any momentum. Just when it
was looking like the golden five-year wonder of the Spice Girls was coming to
an end, Geri Halliwell released her biggest success to date, her cover of the Weather Girls’ ‘It’s Raining Men’,
which stayed at #1 for two weeks and served as the theme to the massive movie
‘Bridget Jones’s Diary’. Around the same time Emma Bunton released her debut solo album, A Girl Like Me, with lead single ‘What Took You So Long’ which,
like Halliwell’s ‘Men’, hit #1 and stayed there for two weeks.
Victoria
Beckham was the last Spice Girl to release a solo
album. Her self titled album received very poor critical and commercial success
and she has yet to make another. Where her singing career has waned, Victoria
has become the best known of all of the girls. She is now a very successful
fashion designer, television personality and is, of course, married to David Beckham and is mother to their
four children. Victoria’s most successful single remains ‘Out of Your Mind’
with Truesteppers, although it is
‘Let Your Head Go’ which seems to be the favourite with fans.
Beyond ‘It’s Raining Men’, Halliwell’s
career seemed to slow down, with her third album Passion failing to make the Top 40. Melanie C continued on a steady path, gaining a cult following and is about
to release her fifth solo album, The Sea,
in September 2011. Emma Bunton achieved the rare feat of her second album
receiving more success than her first. Free
Me gave Emma the hits ‘Maybe’, ‘I’ll Be There’ and ‘Free Me’. Emma went on
to have a very successful television career.
In 2007, all five of the Spice Girls
announced ‘The Return of the Spice Girls World Tour’. The tour, initially
planned as a one night only affair, played 47 dates and grossed over
$70,000,000, including a record 17 sold out nights at London’s o2 Arena. The
associated album, Greatest Hits, hit
#2 and received Platinum status. While Spice Girls comeback was clearly a
success, at the end of the tour, in February 2008, the girls continued on their
separate journeys. All of the girls are now mothers. Melanie B is a judge on
Australia’s ‘X Factor’, has her own fitness interactive game and has featured
on many American shows; Melanie C continues to find success as a solo artist
and starred in the West End version of ‘Blood Brothers’, winning awards along
the way; Emma Bunton is a judge on ‘Dancing on Ice’; Victoria Beckham continues
to be Victoria Beckham- one of the most written and talked about celebrities in
the world; and Geri Halliwell is about to unleash her fourth solo album. It
looks like the Spice Girls, in one way or another, are still very much a part
of our celebrity culture as they were fifteen years ago.
JCS is Eyewear's Music Critic. He divides his time between London and Hull. He is working on a novel.
Jesse Owens: Fastest Man Alive 75 Years Ago
It seems almost like a different age, but it was only 75 years ago today, August 3, that Jesse Owens - my hero and candidate for greatest American - won the 100 m sprint at the 1936 Berlin Olympics, shaming the racism inherent in that most evil and grandiose of settings. Owens, whose own life was not a bed of roses after his triumph in Germany, returned to an America unable or unwilling to accept African-American excellence, poise and achievement - and, these days, that sounds sadly familiar (I watch from afar as another great man, President Obama, is under-appreciated by too many Americans). I read about Owens when I was a kid. Although Canadian, we were taught to read using the Lippincott Readers, which emphasised American history; well, so be it. I was brainwashed. But I learned much about my neighbours to the South, not all of it bad. Anyway, throughout my life, whenever facing hurdles, I have thought of the great Owens. Of course, Owens was human, not an angel. He smoked too much for too long, and died of lung cancer; he raced horses for money; and, struggled financially for years, working as a gas station attendant to make ends meet after his Olympian moment had flickered out. He went bankrupt, and was only redeemed in the last decade of his life, when the US government allowed him to have a more public role. Few people have had such highs and lows, but fewer have run under the gaze of AH, and mocked an ideology of race hatred with sheer force of bodily grace and aplomb.
Sophie Mayer Reviews Kangurashi No Arrietty
A Little (Less Than)
Kin but More Than Kind:Kangurashi No
Arrietty (Arrietty and the Borrowers)
reviewed by Sophie Mayer
“I left my childhood
in the garden green”: the haunting refrain of Cecile Corbel’s ‘Arrietty’s Song’
is first heard in the opening minutes of Studio Ghibli’s film adaptation of
Mary Norton’s The Borrowers, when the
voiceover narration aligns the viewer with Sho, a young boy with a heart defect
who is being sent to spend the summer with his Aunty, in the house where she
and his mother grew up. From the opening, the film has a sense of melancholy
loss similar to The Virgin Suicides,
an unusual mood for a children’s film. The mood is borne out by the story:
Sho’s illness is left unresolved at the end, and Arrietty – the Borrower whom
he meets in the house – is leaving with her family. Leaving the house, and
leaving Sho.
In many ways, the film
does everything it can to induce the viewer to want another ending: one in
which Sho’s friendship with Arrietty, his courage in twitting the cranky
housekeeper Haru, and his Aunty’s care and understanding, would ensure a safe
life for the Borrower family (and thus recovery for himself) in the old house.
Much is made of the magical Empire dolls’ house that Sho’s grandfather had made
in England after his childhood sightings of the ‘little people.’ Filled with
replica European high culture objets
on a Borrower scale, it is an exquisite work of craft, made by a master
cabinetmaker, Aunty tells Sho. Part of my heart yearned for the classic moment
of recognition and reconciliation, in which, as a talisman of luck for Sho’s
operation, Arrietty would bring her parents, Pod and Homily, to meet Sho and
his Aunty, who longs to recapture her own childhood glimpses.
But, like Ghibli’s
adaptation of Howl’s Moving Castle,
with its bittersweet, unsentimental conclusion, Arrietty doesn’t give the audience what it wants, but what it
needs. Rather than a closing a satisfying narrative about how non-human Others
(toys, pets) should love (ie: submit adoringly) their human masters and conform
to a human-shaped world, as the third Toy
Story film did relentlessly, the end of Arrietty
opens out into risk, an unfamiliar gesture for a children’s film. Arrietty
lights out for the territory, but – unlike Huck Finn – she doesn’t abscond. She
is travelling with her parents, and with a non-domestic Borrower, Spiller, who
rescued Pod and knows of the whereabouts of other members of the vanishingly
rare species.
There’s a deeply
serious ecological thread in the film, as there was in Ghibli’s previous film Ponyo (On a Cliff by the Sea). There,
the non-human Ponyo made a choice to stay in the human world with her human
friend Sosuke, who proclaimed that he loved her as a girl and as a fish. Here,
Sho and Arrietty have a profound conversation about vulnerability and hope,
punctuated by Nisa the cat attempting to catch Arrietty and eventually learning
to respect her. That cross-species respect, as fostered by Sho’s gentleness and
Arrietty’s boldness (she seeks out Sho against her parents’ wishes and
fear-inducing stories), is central to the film: Arrietty and Sho are not kin; the kindness between them draws
not on the simple but superior fellow feeling of liberal human rights discourse
(Borrowers are like us, but smaller and cuter and therefore we should organise
their lives paternalistically, as Sho attempts when he makes a life-threatening
gift of the dolls’ house kitchen), but on a more complicated respect for, and
across, difference. Thus, the film has to resolve in being unresolved, in the
chances we all take in moving through a world inhabited by Others, and in which
we are Other.
Animation makes this
possible in a way that live action can’t (although the live action adaptations
of the books, for TV and film, have their own charms). It’s a matter of scale,
but not only scale: as Lord of the Rings
showed, in-camera tricks of scale are as old and effective as perspective
drawing. The animation can use scale in a subtle and indeed poetic way:
Arrietty’s worldview is profoundly different from Sho’s, a fact suggested by
the combination of Sho’s voiceover and the aerial shot of Tokyo that opens the
film, and is reaffirmed by the Borrowers’ experience of Sho’s ‘gift,’ a godlike
act of destruction that (painfully, in light of recent events in Japan)
resembles an earthquake. Arrietty’s perspective, on the other hand, is on the
scale of insects, those non-human Others we frequently despise and fear (as
useless and destructive) or celebrate (as merely decorative, or as serving
human needs): she consorts with crickets, mealy bugs, ladybirds and
butterflies. The scenery that accompanies her journeys around the house and
garden is that of minutely-detailed woodgrain and leaf-vein. Viewing the world
with Arrietty, we see the crumbs and crumbling of the old house that is not
visible to the humans: the torn screen door that allows her into the pantry to
rescue Homily and the basement of broken bricks, rats and detritus suggest that
the house is not the paradise we might want it to be.
And this makes me
rethink the nature of the film’s melancholy. The large and rambling house has
been practically empty (childless) until Sho’s arrival (which has a similar
galvanising effect to the arrival of the family in My Neighbour Totoro), and the humans talk about and imply the
impact of changes in values and lifestyles in contemporary Japan, from
cellphones to global business travel. ‘The garden green’ is, itself, overgrown
and neglected, making it a safe place for childhood to be both lived and
preserved. So the melancholy of the ending is that humans could learn from
Borrowers about not being attached to
bricks, mortar and merchandise; not only the Wombling message of ingenuity and
ingenuousness needed to live frugally, pleasurably and determinedly outside
capital, but a lightness of being that sparkles into view during the end
credits as Arrietty sees a fish flicking its tail in the river beneath their floating
teapot: dangerous, but also vivid in a way that life in a dollhouse would never
allow.
Wildness. Which, as
Jay Griffiths points out in Wild, is
also the terrain of the sexual. As the fish passes by, Arrietty accepts a
raspberry roughly proferred by Spiller, his eyes averted. Glimmering redly, the
berry connects visually to the carefully-chosen red dress and hair clip
Arrietty wears to go ‘borrowing’, and to the garden poppies that blow behind
her when she finally lets Sho see her. Aged fourteen, Arrietty is a character
tremulously (and tremendously) on the verge of active sexuality, which is
figured, subtly, as part of her becoming, along with/as analogy to her first
borrowing mission – which does, after all, take her into a teenage boy’s
bedroom. The subsequent scene in which she hides, silhouetted, behind a tissue
is flirtatious and sensitively erotic. As Steve Rose has written, this is a
particular hallmark of child characters of all genders (including
magic-fish-girl) in Ghibli’s films, and the absolute inversion of Disney’s
sanctimonious, scrupulously anti-sexual narratives.
Arrietty and Sho both
leave their childhood in the final encounter in the ‘garden green’, but it’s no
‘garden of Eden’: childhood is a time of enforced dependency, induced anxiety
and limited horizons for both of them. Through their interaction, they have
braved the encounter with the Other, and sought neither dominance nor
submission despite the fears and sentiments of the adults around them. Sho
recognises that, much as Arrietty and her family borrow from humans what is
needful, but do not seem committed to ownership, he too has ‘borrowed’ Arrietty
for a time, at a particular moment in his life. He cannot keep her any more
than Homily can keep and carry the dolls’ house kitchen with its miniature iron
stove. This idea, that we ‘borrow’ each other as needed, not only makes all the
world and its creatures a library where we must treat each other (as potential
borrowers and borrowees) with care and respect, but underlines the sense of
transience, vulnerability and risk that are the hallmark of Ghibli’s style.
What epitomises this
in Arrietty is the animation of
glass, a notoriously difficult substance to represent, as Jonathan Jones notes
concerning the glass orb that may prove definitive evidence that ‘Salvator
Mundi’ was painted by Leonardo da Vinci. Reflective and distortive, glass shows
us ourselves, becoming definitional of human identity – as in the ‘mirror
moment’ of identity formation in infancy, and the ‘mirror test’ of non-human
species’ abilities of self-recognition. From Arrietty’s feisty self-regard in
her mirror as she styles her ponytail in the hair-clip she will eventually give
to Sho as a sign of their shared experience, to the glasses and jars of the
human world that distort, and eventually imprison, the Borrowers, the
fragility, transparency and reflexivity of glass remind us that we only borrow
our identity from the mirroring regard of others.
Sophie Mayer reviews film for Eyewear. Mayer is a bookseller, teacher, editor and the author of two collections of poetry, Her Various Scalpels (Shearsman, 2009) and The Private Parts of Girls (Salt, 2011), as well as The Cinema of Sally Potter: A Politics of Love (Wallflower, 2009). She writes about film regularly for Sight & Sound.
Tuesday, 2 August 2011
Guest Review: Woodward On Potts
Catherine Woodward reviews
Pure Hustle
By Kate Potts
Pure
Hustle is Kate Potts’ first full length book of poetry. It
is a collection about imagination, a theme which she explores from multiple
angles, but her predominant theme would appear to be the role that imagination
plays in the process of memory making and understanding human experience.
Making memories and
understanding events involves some creative effort on our part, we use
imagination to transform experience into recognisable, meaningful narrative
sequences; in Pure Hustle Potts
tunes in to that portion of the mind that creates as it thinks and explores
miscellaneous events in terms of how they are imagined. The findings are quite
exciting.
Reading Pure Hustle is a strange, Through the
Looking Glass sort of experience, the imagined landscapes of many poems are
metaphorised versions of our own world, the world turned image to greater or
lesser degrees, the same but different. Potts has us looking at the world under
the laws of imagination; complex feelings and experiences are understood
through systems of imagery which are personal to the speakers and characters. ‘Resort’
is a fine example
In the other world, you wake –
spin out your limbstalks, sun tough,
electric – arch and dive in, make
no silhouette, no pool wave crest or wake
It is a slanted, thought-provoking way of viewing
the world. The reader is often required to infer real events and objects from
the shape made by their absence from the poems, but this is a totally natural
action: the accompanying style to this abstract stance features a fascinating
kind of indirect description and loosens entrenched ways of thinking about the
world, about actions and time. In this way the real and imaginary can be
interchangeable, so that we recognise things by their essences, not by surface
description. In other words, Potts’ style makes it possible to recognise the
real when it is described in terms of the imaginary.
For example ‘Hog –
huddle of cottons and belly,/he’s flung unconscious’ (‘Greyhound to Syracuse’)
is the initial description of a sleeping man on a coach. ‘Beyond us, the
terraces heave a little in their elaborate stays,/haunch and lift, dog-keen, on
bricked heels’ (‘November 5th’) is a row of neighbours watching a
fireworks display. ‘The light’s buttercups – quick, mossed water’ (‘Proof,
Maybe’) is a remembered amalgamation of family holidays in the country. In this
manner Potts is able to bring much to mind using very little. Her poems inspire
questions: whose imagination am I peering into? What is real here? What isn’t?
Subtly she loosens the distinctions ‘You’re loose,/skinned – a stark brew –
prodding the bag of leaves/as if it holds last tannin, last tea-kick – strong
as a horse’ (‘Flit’) allows us to imagine a woman and a cup of tea in the same
terms at the same time, as the same thing. There is an unparaphrasable logic in
operation in these poems that allows the reader to understand this mirror image
world, to feel that it is familiar, even if the reason for that familiarity
isn’t immediately clear.
When Potts comes back
over that border in poems such as ‘Life in Space’ and ‘Tasseography’, the real
world, by comparison, appears locked off, stilted, trapped in ignorance, making
these poems all the more moving. Potts’ control of her theme is commendable.
But there is an element
to this collection that I found even more intriguing than all the above; as
these poems are predominantly about creative thinking they are also inevitably
about the process of writing poems. They are about the creative logic that
selects a particular metaphor or develops an image complex, it is as if these
poems are the larval stages of other poems just waiting to be written, they are
shadowy and embryonic and for that reason they can be quite chilling. Potts is
clearly conscious of the transformative aspect of poetry; in two of the
collection’s best, ‘Insomnia Chant’ and ‘Against Poetry’, she refuses such
perversions, negating speaker and poem in the process. I found these thrilling
to read as examples of active deconstruction in poetry.
The
kind of language used in Pure Hustle
is something I thought I’d leave until the end of this review. The collection has
been most beneficially praised by Jo Shapcott who puts particular emphasis on
the excellence of Potts’ language. To quote Shapcott ‘Kate Potts is a poet
whose ear and eye for her work are as close to perfect as can be’, Potts’
language has ‘deft and surprising turns’ and ‘intense musicality’. I thoroughly
agree, but in a disagreeable way. As much as I enjoyed Pure Hustle, as much as it fascinated and inspired me I couldn’t
get around the suspicion that it was too
perfect. The rhythm and weighting of her sentences is aesthetically perfect,
her tight-packed syrupy bars of sound are pleasing to any word-lover’s ear. One
might mistakenly suspect that that Potts has put musicality first, at times to
the point of grammatical pile-up. This perfection suggests contrivance, the
poems lack a kind of freedom and sincerity, they lack a palpable joy in poetry.
I am sure that Potts has all these things within her but if so I did not feel that
they came out Pure Hustle. These
poems are, as Jen Hadfield puts it ‘tightly-rhythmed’ and ‘assonance-jellied’
there is something in them that cannot escape the tight seal upon them. It is
as if the poems are required to meet a quota of poetic tone, that they are
being restricted by a necessary pleasantness of language.
Kate Potts’ poetry,
however, is too curious, too far reaching for that to be a major detriment.
There is much richness and dynamism in Pure
Hustle despite the perfectionist restrictions of Potts’ language, language
which, it has to be said, is after all deft, surprising and sharp. But I won’t
be praising that language so unanimously. Pure
Hustle is a colourful and engrossing read, particularly for anyone with an
interest in creative process. I am certain that it will be rewarding. I also
think that Pure Hustle’s language
difficulties raise some important questions for poets: who/what are we writing
for? What ought we to judge the merit of a poem by?
Catherine Woodward reviews regularly for Eyewear. She lives in the city of Norwich where she is enrolled at UEA on the Studies in Fiction MA.
MTV 30
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
THE SWIFT REPORT 2017
A WORK IN PROGRESS... I am writing this first part on the eve of New Year's Eve day - and as new remembrances come to me, I may well...
-
SHOW BIZ SEEMED BIGGER ONCE The Oscars - Academy Awards officially - were once huge cultural events - in 1975, Frank Sinatra, Sammy Davi...
-
SOMETIMES YOU HAVE TO BREAK AN EGG AT EASTER Several major religions are observing solemn, important festivals this month - holy days, ...
-
I WILL VOTE FOR TRUMP, DAMMIT According to the latest CBS, ABC, etc, polls, Clinton is still likely to beat Trump - by percentile ...








